Riddle me this: Is a document that resides on your network and which you embed in an email via a hyperlink the functional equivalent of an attachment to that email?
Magistrate Judge Katherine H. Parker, in a recent decision out
All About eDiscovery
Latest from All About eDiscovery - Page 2
Cooperation and Collaboration in E-Discovery is Still the TARget
By Kathryn Cole
My February 17th blog, “Judges Make the Case for TAR” discussed the widespread acceptance by federal courts of technology assisted review (“TAR”), which is acknowledged as cost effective, efficient, and likely superior to the tried and true keyword…
Courts Won’t Go “Where Angels Fear to Tread” When Deciding On Search Term Issues
Blink, And I’m Gone: E-Discovery Challenges and Considerations With Ephemeral Messaging
By Kathryn Cole
Judges Make the Case for TAR
By Kathryn Cole
Court Enforces Strict Sanctions for Failing to Be Competent in ESI Obligations
By Kathryn Cole
Is Your Zoom-Bombed Meeting Discoverable?
By Kathryn Cole
The Costs of E-Discovery and What May be Recoverable Under 28 U.S.C. § 1920
By Kathryn Cole
TAR 1.0 vs TAR 2.0: Is the Newer Version the Better Version?
By Kathryn Cole
Technology-assisted review (“TAR”) is a powerful tool used to streamline document review. Because data volume is constantly increasing, TAR was designed to leverage human categorization of documents (i.e., responsive/not responsive) to educate software, that would, in turn, categorize additional documents…